Echo 2nd July
Echo 1st July
Comments in the Echo
More comment
You can still sign our petition to the Prime Minister here. It closes on the 25th of August. Speak out while you can. There are still many unanswered questions that Lincolnshire County Council hope that the people of Billinghay will forget about. The future use of the site of the Lafford High is still to be revealed. Anyone have a clue?
Monday, 14 July 2008
Wednesday, 7 May 2008
Tuesday, 6 May 2008
Poor decision by Lincolnshire County Council Executive Committee
What can I say? Having witnessed a very interesting procedure, based no doubt on 'closed shop secrets and lies' I am ashamed to be a citizen of this country. Really I am. I do NOT often feel this way. Men in suits without a smile between them, made decisions based on sometimes spurious anecdotal evidence to CLOSE THE LAFFORD HIGH SCHOOL. As far as I am aware (based on the level of intelligent debate, or lack of it) there was not one single member of the committee who has ever taught children. Please correct me if I am wrong. It became evident that they had not when one member of the troupe declared that it was far easier to deliver a Personalised Curriculum in LARGE SCHOOLS! (I nearly fell off my chair). I defy him to do it. After having successfully run a Personalised Curriculum within my subject area (Secondary Mathematics) at a Special School for Boys with EBD, in the 1990s, I do know just a little bit about what I am talking about. He clearly knows very little. The Director of Education brushed aside the DVD the children made, by rubbishing the quote that repeatedly looped throughout the presentation (muttering something about the quote referring to primary schools!). I realised how LITTLE he actually cares for the most vulnerable children he is responsible for. Has he ever taught a single child? I wonder....
Oh well, if this is the best we can muster up from the men in suits, I may as well give up. Perhaps that is just what they want. Roll on election time. Let's see how much this matters to people :-)
Oh well, if this is the best we can muster up from the men in suits, I may as well give up. Perhaps that is just what they want. Roll on election time. Let's see how much this matters to people :-)
Tuesday May 6th 2008
Lafford High School decision on May 6th by Executive 10.30am, Main Council Chamber at Newlands, Lincoln. Open to the public.
Saturday, 26 April 2008
Lafford DVD
From the Lincolnshire Echo, 26.4.08
Youngsters at a school threatened with closure have recorded a DVD to persuade education bosses that it should be kept open. A final decision on whether to close the Lafford High School, in Billinghay, near Sleaford, is expected within the next two weeks.
Lincolnshire County Council has said falling pupil numbers are forcing its hand and a phased closure by 2010 could be on the cards from this September. After repeated requests by pupils to meet face to face with policy makers, the council has asked the youngsters to record their views on camera.
The resulting three minutes of footage will now be presented to education leaders ahead of their final decision. Sonny Marland (13), one of the 15 pupils involved in the DVD said he hoped the decision takers would listen to their plea. "We have brilliant teachers and excellent education here," he said.
The DVD features the youngsters sitting around a table discussing their fears over the possible closure. Topics include concerns about teachers' jobs and what effect it will have on the village community. Fifteen-year-old Lafford pupil Ben Newton, who is in his final year at the school said: "The closure won't even affect me but that's not the point, I'm worried about the village as a whole."
A spokesman for the council said: "Listening to the views of young people is an important element of the work of children's services. "In response to young people at the Lafford, Peter Duxbury has invited them to record their views which he's looking forward to receiving."
Youngsters at a school threatened with closure have recorded a DVD to persuade education bosses that it should be kept open. A final decision on whether to close the Lafford High School, in Billinghay, near Sleaford, is expected within the next two weeks.
Lincolnshire County Council has said falling pupil numbers are forcing its hand and a phased closure by 2010 could be on the cards from this September. After repeated requests by pupils to meet face to face with policy makers, the council has asked the youngsters to record their views on camera.
The resulting three minutes of footage will now be presented to education leaders ahead of their final decision. Sonny Marland (13), one of the 15 pupils involved in the DVD said he hoped the decision takers would listen to their plea. "We have brilliant teachers and excellent education here," he said.
The DVD features the youngsters sitting around a table discussing their fears over the possible closure. Topics include concerns about teachers' jobs and what effect it will have on the village community. Fifteen-year-old Lafford pupil Ben Newton, who is in his final year at the school said: "The closure won't even affect me but that's not the point, I'm worried about the village as a whole."
A spokesman for the council said: "Listening to the views of young people is an important element of the work of children's services. "In response to young people at the Lafford, Peter Duxbury has invited them to record their views which he's looking forward to receiving."
Tuesday, 22 April 2008
URGENT REQUEST
Dear All,
As I invited the "decision makers" to come and meet the students of which they are making the decision on the future of the school, I have been tasked with making a DVD for which those councillors will watch on our school's behalf. Between the student's opinions I want to state as many facts as possible against the closure of the school.
I NEED YOUR HELP!
I would greatly appreciate all and any points of view and FACTS about the impact on students, community and environment as possible. We must be able to back these facts up with evidence though! If we put our heads together I'm sure we will be able to put a complete argument together for their digestion!
Obviously time is of the essence, and I would need this pdq.
Thanks in advance - please email me directly.
tena.wells@tiscali.co.uk
As I invited the "decision makers" to come and meet the students of which they are making the decision on the future of the school, I have been tasked with making a DVD for which those councillors will watch on our school's behalf. Between the student's opinions I want to state as many facts as possible against the closure of the school.
I NEED YOUR HELP!
I would greatly appreciate all and any points of view and FACTS about the impact on students, community and environment as possible. We must be able to back these facts up with evidence though! If we put our heads together I'm sure we will be able to put a complete argument together for their digestion!
Obviously time is of the essence, and I would need this pdq.
Thanks in advance - please email me directly.
tena.wells@tiscali.co.uk
Monday, 21 April 2008
May 6th Open Meeting at Council Chambers
If at all possible it would be really good for as many people to attend this meeting at the Main Council Chambers. Details as follows:
Lafford High School decision on Tuesday May 6th by Executive 10.30am, Main Council Chamber at Newlands, Lincoln. Open to the public, of course.
I do hope you will join me :-) Thanks, too, to each of the 86 signatories on the PM's e-petition for the Lafford High.
Lafford High School decision on Tuesday May 6th by Executive 10.30am, Main Council Chamber at Newlands, Lincoln. Open to the public, of course.
I do hope you will join me :-) Thanks, too, to each of the 86 signatories on the PM's e-petition for the Lafford High.
Sunday, 13 April 2008
Huge transport costs if Lafford pupils go to other schools
Taken from the Sleaford Standard
EDITOR - I am writing with regard to the proposed closure of the Lafford High School in Billinghay and the consequent proposal to bus secondary school pupils to either Sleaford, Ruskington or Tattershall schools.
It is not so long ago that the county council were complaining of the ever increasing costs of providing transport for rural pupils to access their schools.
At one time pupils from Metheringham went to the Lafford School (c.1996), so perhaps it is time for there to be school admission zones and smaller class sizes which would benefit pupils in many subjects.
If not, how many other secondary schools will be affected by 'falling' numbers?
A M WADDINGTON, Metheringham
At one time pupils from Metheringham went to the Lafford School (c.1996), so perhaps it is time for there to be school admission zones and smaller class sizes which would benefit pupils in many subjects.
If not, how many other secondary schools will be affected by 'falling' numbers?
A M WADDINGTON, Metheringham
Thanks...
... to each of the 72 signatories in support of the Lafford High petition to the PM. Please join us.
Thursday, 10 April 2008
Consultation response
Mr Duxbury
We are committed to the regeneration of this village and very much against the planned closure of the school for the following reasons:
• The school caters for local children who want to go to a local school.
• Many of the children at the school have specifically chosen a small school, because their needs are better met in this environment.
• In a small school, the pupils feel the teachers and other staff know them much better, and can enable them to achieve their best because of this. This is particularly relevant when children have special educational needs (SEN). Some children need this environment to thrive, grow, bond and succeed. There is plenty of evidence to support this. Small schools
• Socially, a small school caters much better for their needs. Should they be forced to attend a larger school, many could face serious bullying, with plenty of evidence to support this. This is already a serious problem at other schools.
• Billinghay is an expanding village with a number of new housing developments. It seems very short sighted to close a secondary school, when the population of children is growing (Billinghay already has a large number of children of all ages). The answer is not to expand the big schools into even bigger schools, but to build up the smaller schools, without losing their small school ethos. Every school must be supported to become an excellent school and have proper investment.
• There appears to be a lot of empire-building in the education system at the moment, sanctioned by Lincolnshire County Council. Following the partnership process the Lafford has been squeezed dry, and has been the main loser in this process. For fours schools to have one head is a ludicrous idea. The job of a head teacher is made to appear easy, discrediting the profession.
• It is very disingenuous for council officers, and councillors to then pass the buck onto the residents of Billinghay, and urge them to send their children to the Lafford to keep it open. Parents are not stupid, and if they see a school being run down over a period of years, they will not choose to send their children there. There has been no proper publicity for the school.
• The school is a big focus of attention for the community. In a village where shops, pubs and other facilities have closed, the closure of a school is a major blow. If it is the Lafford closing today, which schools will be next?
• We already have major concerns over the amount of money spent on transport for school children in Lincolnshire, and how much this affects the other services the council is able to provide (or not). The bussing of another 250 plus children out of the village will just increase this further (estimated at approximately £1500 pa per child). Environmentally, this is also disastrous. The environmental footprint of Lincolnshire children criss-crossing the county in the name of ‘choice’ is phenomenal. Are you, as Director of Children's Services, willing to take accountability for this?
• Where are the pupils going to go? Currently, the other schools in the area do not have enough places for them. No wonder there is a panic among parents and children. Some are transferring pupils out as quick as possible, or putting their houses on the market. There will be a knock on effect on the primary schools in the area as people move away.
• The Lafford High School has actually had a 43.5% increase in pupil numbers from 2002 to 2008, according to council statistics. What then is the reason for closing the school? It doesn’t look like falling rolls. Is it more to do with other schools trying to secure their futures? What kind of a way is this to run an education system? What professional educational experience do you have? A county councillor with a very poor bedside manner managed to offend the teaching profession on her radio interview. Who is in control of education in Lincolnshire? We moved to Lincolnshire from Birmingham where education was managed by Professor Tim Brighouse, a well respected and fine example to all the profession. Can we say the same for Lincolnshire?
• We are concerned that Billinghay is seen as a soft target for a school closure. It is a deprived area, and it looks like it has been deliberately targeted as a place that wouldn’t fight back.
• One of our own biggest concerns is that the council will close the school and then see the site as a great asset for selling off. If the use of the site has to change, why not think creatively and maintain some educational use of the site for local children and people. It is a valuable local resource, not a prime site for housing! Additionally, the location of the school provides a site for use in serious emergencies, like flooding or similar.
• We already have 69 names on the Petition to the Prime Minister
• Additional petitions have been handed in to our MP Douglas Hogg
• We care about the village, the people, the children, the environment. Every Child and Every Citizen matters!
We are committed to the regeneration of this village and very much against the planned closure of the school for the following reasons:
• The school caters for local children who want to go to a local school.
• Many of the children at the school have specifically chosen a small school, because their needs are better met in this environment.
• In a small school, the pupils feel the teachers and other staff know them much better, and can enable them to achieve their best because of this. This is particularly relevant when children have special educational needs (SEN). Some children need this environment to thrive, grow, bond and succeed. There is plenty of evidence to support this. Small schools
• Socially, a small school caters much better for their needs. Should they be forced to attend a larger school, many could face serious bullying, with plenty of evidence to support this. This is already a serious problem at other schools.
• Billinghay is an expanding village with a number of new housing developments. It seems very short sighted to close a secondary school, when the population of children is growing (Billinghay already has a large number of children of all ages). The answer is not to expand the big schools into even bigger schools, but to build up the smaller schools, without losing their small school ethos. Every school must be supported to become an excellent school and have proper investment.
• There appears to be a lot of empire-building in the education system at the moment, sanctioned by Lincolnshire County Council. Following the partnership process the Lafford has been squeezed dry, and has been the main loser in this process. For fours schools to have one head is a ludicrous idea. The job of a head teacher is made to appear easy, discrediting the profession.
• It is very disingenuous for council officers, and councillors to then pass the buck onto the residents of Billinghay, and urge them to send their children to the Lafford to keep it open. Parents are not stupid, and if they see a school being run down over a period of years, they will not choose to send their children there. There has been no proper publicity for the school.
• The school is a big focus of attention for the community. In a village where shops, pubs and other facilities have closed, the closure of a school is a major blow. If it is the Lafford closing today, which schools will be next?
• We already have major concerns over the amount of money spent on transport for school children in Lincolnshire, and how much this affects the other services the council is able to provide (or not). The bussing of another 250 plus children out of the village will just increase this further (estimated at approximately £1500 pa per child). Environmentally, this is also disastrous. The environmental footprint of Lincolnshire children criss-crossing the county in the name of ‘choice’ is phenomenal. Are you, as Director of Children's Services, willing to take accountability for this?
• Where are the pupils going to go? Currently, the other schools in the area do not have enough places for them. No wonder there is a panic among parents and children. Some are transferring pupils out as quick as possible, or putting their houses on the market. There will be a knock on effect on the primary schools in the area as people move away.
• The Lafford High School has actually had a 43.5% increase in pupil numbers from 2002 to 2008, according to council statistics. What then is the reason for closing the school? It doesn’t look like falling rolls. Is it more to do with other schools trying to secure their futures? What kind of a way is this to run an education system? What professional educational experience do you have? A county councillor with a very poor bedside manner managed to offend the teaching profession on her radio interview. Who is in control of education in Lincolnshire? We moved to Lincolnshire from Birmingham where education was managed by Professor Tim Brighouse, a well respected and fine example to all the profession. Can we say the same for Lincolnshire?
• We are concerned that Billinghay is seen as a soft target for a school closure. It is a deprived area, and it looks like it has been deliberately targeted as a place that wouldn’t fight back.
• One of our own biggest concerns is that the council will close the school and then see the site as a great asset for selling off. If the use of the site has to change, why not think creatively and maintain some educational use of the site for local children and people. It is a valuable local resource, not a prime site for housing! Additionally, the location of the school provides a site for use in serious emergencies, like flooding or similar.
• We already have 69 names on the Petition to the Prime Minister
• Additional petitions have been handed in to our MP Douglas Hogg
• We care about the village, the people, the children, the environment. Every Child and Every Citizen matters!
Wednesday, 2 April 2008
Tuesday, 1 April 2008
Petition
If you would like to sign the petition, please click here!
Keep up the pressure, encourage everyone you know to support the school and the future of small schools.
Thanks everyone, a week into the petition and we have 55 names :-)
Keep up the pressure, encourage everyone you know to support the school and the future of small schools.
Thanks everyone, a week into the petition and we have 55 names :-)
Monday, 31 March 2008
Public Meeting 3rd April @ 6.00pm
A public meeting will be held at the school on Thursday 3 April at 6.00pm as part of the consultation on the proposed phased closure of the Lafford High School. Please attend.
Wednesday, 26 March 2008
Another letter
From the Sleaford Standard
EDITOR-As the parent of a child at the Aveland High School, Billingborough, I support the opinions expressed last week by a Lafford High School parent that pupils are 'cherry-picks' for St George's.
I am in no doubt that St George's College of Technology is an excellent facility, but so is the Aveland High School. In my opinion this amalgamation of schools has had nothing but a damaging effect on the smaller schools in the group. As reported by one parent in the Standard about their choice of the Lafford High School, I too chose Aveland for its small size and fantastic team.
All Mr Watson seems to say is how wonderful St George's is, which no-one disputes, but please remember that some of us have chosen to send our children to a school with approximately 250 pupils overall, rather than 250 pupils in one year. My most recent experience of this merger is that Year 9 children choosing their options are being offered the chance to undertake them at St George's, whilst still remaining a member of the Aveland School.
So, not only are they making one of the most important decisions of their lives, if they decide to move then they have the added stress of moving schools. I feel it is dangling a carrot for these children, and children by their very nature tend to think the grass is greener on the other side.
I'm sure this is all part of the bigger picture, offering children a 'wide and varied curriculum' but at a time which is stressful enough these children have plenty to worry about without the added 'suggestion' of a bigger and better choice.
Thankfully the Aveland School, so far, has dealt with the 'change' admirably; I am in no doubt that this is all down to good team work and an already established ethos. There is a place for smaller establishments and children thrive where they are happy.
SA, Heckington
EDITOR-As the parent of a child at the Aveland High School, Billingborough, I support the opinions expressed last week by a Lafford High School parent that pupils are 'cherry-picks' for St George's.
I am in no doubt that St George's College of Technology is an excellent facility, but so is the Aveland High School. In my opinion this amalgamation of schools has had nothing but a damaging effect on the smaller schools in the group. As reported by one parent in the Standard about their choice of the Lafford High School, I too chose Aveland for its small size and fantastic team.
All Mr Watson seems to say is how wonderful St George's is, which no-one disputes, but please remember that some of us have chosen to send our children to a school with approximately 250 pupils overall, rather than 250 pupils in one year. My most recent experience of this merger is that Year 9 children choosing their options are being offered the chance to undertake them at St George's, whilst still remaining a member of the Aveland School.
So, not only are they making one of the most important decisions of their lives, if they decide to move then they have the added stress of moving schools. I feel it is dangling a carrot for these children, and children by their very nature tend to think the grass is greener on the other side.
I'm sure this is all part of the bigger picture, offering children a 'wide and varied curriculum' but at a time which is stressful enough these children have plenty to worry about without the added 'suggestion' of a bigger and better choice.
Thankfully the Aveland School, so far, has dealt with the 'change' admirably; I am in no doubt that this is all down to good team work and an already established ethos. There is a place for smaller establishments and children thrive where they are happy.
SA, Heckington
Tuesday, 25 March 2008
Petition the Prime Minister
The Lafford High School, Billinghay in rural Lincolnshire, is NOT a failing school. It is one of the most improved schools in the country. It has wonderful members of staff and lovely children. Many have additional needs which require extra support and a caring environment, which the school provides very well. We are now faced with closure.
The staff, governors and parents are committed to the school. Our village community would suffer a severe blow if we were to lose the school. The school was not large enough to be included as part of a bigger academy and now faces closure.
We seek your support in securing a future for each and every child who wants to be at the school.
If you would like to sign the petition, please click here!http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/laffordhigh/
Thanks everyone.
Update:
Just a few hours after publicising the petition we already have 21 signatures. Please keep it up, invite your friends, family, especially local people. This is all in addition to the local petitions, the online one on this blog and others that are still going around. This means a lot. Thanks :-)
Friday, 21 March 2008
Chairman of Governors and Children's Services Director: Their views
From the Sleaford Standard
DEREK Daniels, chairman of governors at Lafford High School, has vowed that the fight to save the school goes on.
He said: "Mr Watson listened to what was said at the meeting and he has given the parents what they want. He has answered their wishes so parents have got a chance to keep the school open and the fight continues." He added: "I would like to thank Paul, St George's and the governors who have helped us over the last two years."
He said Mrs Irvine received a standing ovation from other staff members when the announcement was made she had been appointed acting head and he said all the staff and governors are behind her.
---
Peter Duxbury, Lincolnshire's Director of Children's Services, said parents at the meeting expressed dissatisfaction with the leadership in spite of the fact Mr Watson had led the school thorough a period of significant improvement, with examination results improving over the past two years.
He said: "The consultation process regarding closure of the school will continue. In the meantime the support given to The Lafford School by the local authority and St George's will continue, though without the executive leadership of Mr Watson. "The local authority would like to thank Mr Watson and governors at St George's for their continued support of schools in the area."
DEREK Daniels, chairman of governors at Lafford High School, has vowed that the fight to save the school goes on.
He said: "Mr Watson listened to what was said at the meeting and he has given the parents what they want. He has answered their wishes so parents have got a chance to keep the school open and the fight continues." He added: "I would like to thank Paul, St George's and the governors who have helped us over the last two years."
He said Mrs Irvine received a standing ovation from other staff members when the announcement was made she had been appointed acting head and he said all the staff and governors are behind her.
---
Peter Duxbury, Lincolnshire's Director of Children's Services, said parents at the meeting expressed dissatisfaction with the leadership in spite of the fact Mr Watson had led the school thorough a period of significant improvement, with examination results improving over the past two years.
He said: "The consultation process regarding closure of the school will continue. In the meantime the support given to The Lafford School by the local authority and St George's will continue, though without the executive leadership of Mr Watson. "The local authority would like to thank Mr Watson and governors at St George's for their continued support of schools in the area."
Lafford's numbers have to add up
From the Sleaford Standard
EDITOR – I attended the meeting on March 6 at the Lafford High School, Billinghay to discuss the proposal by the governors to close the school. Understandably, passions were running very high. I attended the Lafford High School many years ago and I have very fond memories of my time spent there under the headship of Mr Padgett.
In the last few years since the Lafford High School has been working in partnership with St George's, it has made improvements year on year under the headship of Paul Watson. This is due to the good leadership of Paul and the dedication of the teachers and staff who have all worked extremely hard.
My understanding of the problem is that there are not sufficient pupils coming into the school from this summer (19 in total) and the pupils in the local primary schools for the coming years are very low in number.
This will mean that the overall numbers within the school will continue to fall year on year which will make the school unviable in terms of educational provision and finance. The local management of schools funding is mostly decided by pupil numbers and, although the county council has very limited discretion, it is obliged to follow the Government's funding formula.
Closing the school is something the council has desperately tried to avoid. This is why the partnership was encouraged with St George's and additional support provided to the school for many years by the county council. Without better parental support in terms of numbers it is difficult to see a better way forward in the interests of the children.
If local people want to keep the school open we need more children to attend – so if you have a child or grandchild who is 11 years or over please consider sending them to the Lafford High School.
As the local councillor I would be happy to discuss the issue in more detail. I can be contacted at cllrp.bradwell@lincolnshire.gov.uk or by telephone on 01526 352842.
COUNCILLOR PATRICIA BRADWELL
County Councillor for Billinghay & Metheringham
____
What is your response to this, please? All comments welcome. Please contact Patricia Bradwell as well if you feel the need to.
EDITOR – I attended the meeting on March 6 at the Lafford High School, Billinghay to discuss the proposal by the governors to close the school. Understandably, passions were running very high. I attended the Lafford High School many years ago and I have very fond memories of my time spent there under the headship of Mr Padgett.
In the last few years since the Lafford High School has been working in partnership with St George's, it has made improvements year on year under the headship of Paul Watson. This is due to the good leadership of Paul and the dedication of the teachers and staff who have all worked extremely hard.
My understanding of the problem is that there are not sufficient pupils coming into the school from this summer (19 in total) and the pupils in the local primary schools for the coming years are very low in number.
This will mean that the overall numbers within the school will continue to fall year on year which will make the school unviable in terms of educational provision and finance. The local management of schools funding is mostly decided by pupil numbers and, although the county council has very limited discretion, it is obliged to follow the Government's funding formula.
Closing the school is something the council has desperately tried to avoid. This is why the partnership was encouraged with St George's and additional support provided to the school for many years by the county council. Without better parental support in terms of numbers it is difficult to see a better way forward in the interests of the children.
If local people want to keep the school open we need more children to attend – so if you have a child or grandchild who is 11 years or over please consider sending them to the Lafford High School.
As the local councillor I would be happy to discuss the issue in more detail. I can be contacted at cllrp.bradwell@lincolnshire.gov.uk or by telephone on 01526 352842.
COUNCILLOR PATRICIA BRADWELL
County Councillor for Billinghay & Metheringham
____
What is your response to this, please? All comments welcome. Please contact Patricia Bradwell as well if you feel the need to.
School closure will drive families away
I found much encouragement and hope in this letter, for it talks of community. It talks about the difficult path of standing up for justice. My community, your community, our community. Thanks so much, Don.
Again from the Sleaford Standard (who, by the way, have been very supportive. Thank you.)
EDITOR – I'm trying to relate the comments of Secretary of State Ed Balls to what is happening at the Lafford High School in Billinghay.
Where do such statements made by him as "no child in the 21st century should go to school in fear or be prevented from learning" or "every young person in our country has the chance to fulfil their potential" apply in the scheme of local school closures? Has Mr Balls ever visited the Lafford High School before he gave the OK to instigate its closure? He should come to rural Lincolnshire and experience for himself exactly how these children are going to 'fulfil their potential'.
This school thrives on its children's successes. The children thrive on the school's commitment in helping them achieve their full potential. Isn't that what Mr Balls is saying they should have? This school copes with children other schools have turned away. This school is an achieving school, it is breaking down barriers so all can have equal chances.
The campaign to save the Lafford High School has seen a united community; it has brought out parents and grandparents, aunts and uncles, old Laffordians and potential new Laffordians. Closing this school will see an established community crumble. There'll be no spirit, no communication. It'll leave families dejected as they see younger families move away.
Perhaps it is time the Government needs to appoint a Secretary of State for Deprived Children, Empty Schools and Broken Families.
DJ IRVINE
Billinghay
Again from the Sleaford Standard (who, by the way, have been very supportive. Thank you.)
EDITOR – I'm trying to relate the comments of Secretary of State Ed Balls to what is happening at the Lafford High School in Billinghay.
Where do such statements made by him as "no child in the 21st century should go to school in fear or be prevented from learning" or "every young person in our country has the chance to fulfil their potential" apply in the scheme of local school closures? Has Mr Balls ever visited the Lafford High School before he gave the OK to instigate its closure? He should come to rural Lincolnshire and experience for himself exactly how these children are going to 'fulfil their potential'.
This school thrives on its children's successes. The children thrive on the school's commitment in helping them achieve their full potential. Isn't that what Mr Balls is saying they should have? This school copes with children other schools have turned away. This school is an achieving school, it is breaking down barriers so all can have equal chances.
The campaign to save the Lafford High School has seen a united community; it has brought out parents and grandparents, aunts and uncles, old Laffordians and potential new Laffordians. Closing this school will see an established community crumble. There'll be no spirit, no communication. It'll leave families dejected as they see younger families move away.
Perhaps it is time the Government needs to appoint a Secretary of State for Deprived Children, Empty Schools and Broken Families.
DJ IRVINE
Billinghay
Monday, 17 March 2008
Simple arithmetic
From the figures on record:
The school in Tattershall has 52 surplus spaces.
The school in Ruskington has 11 surplus spaces.
The school in Sleaford has 0 spaces (due to an excess of 94)
52+11+0=63
Number of places needed for Lafford children = 268
268-63=205
That leaves 205 children from the Lafford needing to be provided for. If they all left TODAY, they would be without a school place. Perhaps that would shake up the system!
The school in Tattershall has 52 surplus spaces.
The school in Ruskington has 11 surplus spaces.
The school in Sleaford has 0 spaces (due to an excess of 94)
52+11+0=63
Number of places needed for Lafford children = 268
268-63=205
That leaves 205 children from the Lafford needing to be provided for. If they all left TODAY, they would be without a school place. Perhaps that would shake up the system!
Monday's Echo
MP joins fight !?! As reported in today's Lincolnshire Echo. I wonder if Mr Balls will get involved.
If 'caring parents 101020' figures are accurate (see post below), and I have no reason to doubt they are, there aren't enough places for all the children The Lafford currently holds, to go to!
Looks like the biggest school has numbers in excess of the allocated NOR, so what is going to happen to the 268 children from the Lafford? Even with all the places counted up at the Gartree and other local secondaries, there still aren't enough places. What next folks? Perhaps they will build a NEW SCHOOL for us!
If 'caring parents 101020' figures are accurate (see post below), and I have no reason to doubt they are, there aren't enough places for all the children The Lafford currently holds, to go to!
Looks like the biggest school has numbers in excess of the allocated NOR, so what is going to happen to the 268 children from the Lafford? Even with all the places counted up at the Gartree and other local secondaries, there still aren't enough places. What next folks? Perhaps they will build a NEW SCHOOL for us!
Let's take a closer look
NOT FALLING ROLLS BUT AN INCREASE
The Lafford High School has had a 43.5% increase in pupil numbers from 2002 to 2008.
The Lincolnshire School Organisation Plan downloads of years 2002-2007, 2003-2008, 2004-2009 supplement, 2005-2010 update, 2006-2011 update and 2007- 2012 update, state the numbers on roll at the Lafford High School.
The numbers on roll (NOR) for The Lafford High School were:
January 2002 187 pupils
January 2003 190 pupils
January 2004 247 pupils
January 2005 273 pupils
January 2006 288 pupils
September 2007 262 pupils
The letter from Children’s services then states:
January 2008 268 pupils
This is an increase of 81 pupils between 2002 and 2008
NOT A DECREASE.
It is stated the falling rolls are also affecting the neighbouring areas of Tattershall, Ruskington and Sleaford.
According to the School organisation plan the numbers on roll for Tattershall secondary school was 513 in January 2002 and was still 513 as of September 2007.
The numbers on roll for the Ruskington secondary school was 345 in January 2002 and has INCREASED by 20 to 365 as stated for roll numbers in September 2007.
The roll numbers for St. George’s College of Technology in Sleaford in January 2002 was 1350 and has INCREASED by 323 to 1673 pupils in September 2007, which incidentally is an excess of 94 over the capacity of the school.
It is stated that if The Lafford High School closes, parents will be offered the choice of a place, with transport provided where appropriate, at neighbouring schools to be named.
The school in Tattershall has 52 surplus spaces.
The school in Ruskington has 11 surplus spaces.
The school in Sleaford has 0 spaces due to an excess of 94.
These figures are recorded in the Lincolnshire School Organisation Plan update September 2007.
There are 268 pupils recorded at The Lafford High School and only 63 available spaces in neighbouring schools at present.
THE LAFFORD HIGH SCHOOL IS ESSENTIAL AND VITAL.
caring parents, Billinghay 101020
----
Thank you so much 'caring parents 101020' for your hard work in sifting through the figures.
---
Note: If you would like to check them out for yourself, please click here.
School Organisation Plans 2003-2008 from Lincolnshire County Council website.
The Lafford High School has had a 43.5% increase in pupil numbers from 2002 to 2008.
The Lincolnshire School Organisation Plan downloads of years 2002-2007, 2003-2008, 2004-2009 supplement, 2005-2010 update, 2006-2011 update and 2007- 2012 update, state the numbers on roll at the Lafford High School.
The numbers on roll (NOR) for The Lafford High School were:
January 2002 187 pupils
January 2003 190 pupils
January 2004 247 pupils
January 2005 273 pupils
January 2006 288 pupils
September 2007 262 pupils
The letter from Children’s services then states:
January 2008 268 pupils
This is an increase of 81 pupils between 2002 and 2008
NOT A DECREASE.
It is stated the falling rolls are also affecting the neighbouring areas of Tattershall, Ruskington and Sleaford.
According to the School organisation plan the numbers on roll for Tattershall secondary school was 513 in January 2002 and was still 513 as of September 2007.
The numbers on roll for the Ruskington secondary school was 345 in January 2002 and has INCREASED by 20 to 365 as stated for roll numbers in September 2007.
The roll numbers for St. George’s College of Technology in Sleaford in January 2002 was 1350 and has INCREASED by 323 to 1673 pupils in September 2007, which incidentally is an excess of 94 over the capacity of the school.
It is stated that if The Lafford High School closes, parents will be offered the choice of a place, with transport provided where appropriate, at neighbouring schools to be named.
The school in Tattershall has 52 surplus spaces.
The school in Ruskington has 11 surplus spaces.
The school in Sleaford has 0 spaces due to an excess of 94.
These figures are recorded in the Lincolnshire School Organisation Plan update September 2007.
There are 268 pupils recorded at The Lafford High School and only 63 available spaces in neighbouring schools at present.
THE LAFFORD HIGH SCHOOL IS ESSENTIAL AND VITAL.
caring parents, Billinghay 101020
----
Thank you so much 'caring parents 101020' for your hard work in sifting through the figures.
---
Note: If you would like to check them out for yourself, please click here.
School Organisation Plans 2003-2008 from Lincolnshire County Council website.
Sunday, 16 March 2008
An open letter
An open letter regarding the proposed closure of The Lafford High School, Billinghay
As a happy resident of Billinghay since 2002, I am unwilling to just lie down and accept that the local secondary school should just shut up shop and disappear. There are still many unanswered questions, many of which your journalists may have ways of investigating.
In a recent letter (dated 11.3.08) to parents, the Head of Children's Services makes his points and shares his views. Whatever discussions have taken place prior to this letter, much of it has taken place behind closed doors. This appears to be the practice of our leaders today.
In his letter, Mr Duxbury cites falling numbers as a problem that affects our wider community, listing the local Billinghay primary school as well as the towns of Tattershall, Ruskington and Sleaford as facing this same trend. Has he been to these places to tell parents that the same fate will befall them?
Interestingly, he cites government planning terms for secondary schools as requiring an annual intake over 120 children in order to remain sustainable. By that, I take it to mean that if your school has an intake below this, you will be closed. How many Lincolnshire schools will be affected by this? Give us some figures, please.
What is the justification behind his statement? Well, allegedly these numbers are ‘needed to stimulate learning through social interaction which leads to the sharing of ideas, information and experiences’ as part of the answer. Excuse me, this happens in groups much, much smaller that the numbers quoted, at dining tables and classrooms all over the world and in these islands. Evidence, Mr Duxbury. I would like you to share the evidence for your acceptance of these government terms with all of us. Secondary school children, you allege, are unable to learn in year groups smaller than this size, what about primary schools? Any self-respecting professional in education, home educating parent, anyone who works with young people, or anyone who knows a little bit about ‘education’ (in the widest sense) would have a little chuckle at this. Why then is the government so obsessed with keeping class sizes down? Because children learn best when the group size matches their needs, they are happy, well supervised and content. Children were never designed to learn in gangs!
Yes, the introduction of Diplomas will necessitate changes, because all children at KS4 are entitled to them. Our education department will need to ensure that all schools, not just the ones with super heads, academies and casino style schools which bring in big bucks, have a right to an education. The young people, families and residents of Billinghay deserve a look in.
“OFSTED and earlier research reveal small school community worth. Planning research has shown that costed against the tax-paying base major local authority services like education cost least in the smallest communities, most in the largest. The school is often the only return for village tax-payers on moneys otherwise spent largely in the towns. One LEA argued a few years ago that high unit costs were so fragmentary an element of the overall budget that savings from closing all its small schools would bring a one-off £50 payment to the rest ........jam spread thin indeed! Escalating dependence on transport is financially unwise, unpredictable and at odds with environmental policy.” Mervyn Benford of NASS
This potential school closure in Billinghay necessitates an escalating dependence on transport. We already spend a LOT of money on school transport (perhaps the people of Lincolnshire need to see figures for this published in the media), with young people living the life of commuters from the age of 12 (some start even earlier) all in the name of choice. Is there any evidence to prove that this is money well spent (apart from anecdotal evidence)? We have all just received our phenomenal Lincolnshire County Council Tax bills. What percentage of that is paying for school transport? Please enlighten us. How can we continue to justify big bills when alternative means have not been explored? This does not even touch upon the moral and ethical issues of our environmental footprint for the commuting child. Is there an argument for one teacher to commute to the children, or hundreds of children to commute to their teacher? No easy answers, but LCC has to provide some evidence for their decisions.
The ‘consultation letter’ talks about meetings with parents/carers and staff. No mention of the wider community. What about the future parents living in the village? What about those who may want to work locally, to have a part time job that they can walk to? Do they not have a voice? Have they been officially informed about all of this? Perhaps there are those who are sitting back in the belief that their child is far too intelligent to want a place at the school. Well, there are no guarantees, regarding intelligence or provision. All it would take would be for a different government to be voted in! So, while there is a process governed by law, there are also processes governed by conscience. Is that not what we as parents and educators strive to train up our children to achieve? The staff at the Lafford provide a good example of this.
As a parent myself, I was most shocked by the reactions at the open meeting held at the school. Broken promises, some parents feeling let down, tearful children pleading for their school, teachers (ever the professionals) silently observing. What messages were being communicated that night? Those ultimately responsible for the education of the children in our village (yes, our village) were passing on some very strong messages that night. Not about what they had done, more about what they hadn’t done.
As law-abiding citizens of this country, we still have free will and freedom of speech. As parents we have rights and responsibilities. Section 7 of the Education Act 1996 clearly spells out our parental responsibilities. “The parent of every child of compulsory school age shall cause him to receive efficient full-time education suitable to his age, ability and aptitude, and to any special educational needs he may have, either by regular attendance at school or otherwise.” As a result of the proposed closure, many parents are not making informed choices, but are being forced to choose because of fear of their child missing out on an education.
We can only make informed choices if those in authority make wise decisions. So, to those responsible for making these decisions, I appeal to your better natures to enable the parents of children in Billinghay and beyond, to exercise these rights and responsibilities. Listen, look around you, be filled with compassion, switch on your conscience, then act.
As a happy resident of Billinghay since 2002, I am unwilling to just lie down and accept that the local secondary school should just shut up shop and disappear. There are still many unanswered questions, many of which your journalists may have ways of investigating.
In a recent letter (dated 11.3.08) to parents, the Head of Children's Services makes his points and shares his views. Whatever discussions have taken place prior to this letter, much of it has taken place behind closed doors. This appears to be the practice of our leaders today.
In his letter, Mr Duxbury cites falling numbers as a problem that affects our wider community, listing the local Billinghay primary school as well as the towns of Tattershall, Ruskington and Sleaford as facing this same trend. Has he been to these places to tell parents that the same fate will befall them?
Interestingly, he cites government planning terms for secondary schools as requiring an annual intake over 120 children in order to remain sustainable. By that, I take it to mean that if your school has an intake below this, you will be closed. How many Lincolnshire schools will be affected by this? Give us some figures, please.
What is the justification behind his statement? Well, allegedly these numbers are ‘needed to stimulate learning through social interaction which leads to the sharing of ideas, information and experiences’ as part of the answer. Excuse me, this happens in groups much, much smaller that the numbers quoted, at dining tables and classrooms all over the world and in these islands. Evidence, Mr Duxbury. I would like you to share the evidence for your acceptance of these government terms with all of us. Secondary school children, you allege, are unable to learn in year groups smaller than this size, what about primary schools? Any self-respecting professional in education, home educating parent, anyone who works with young people, or anyone who knows a little bit about ‘education’ (in the widest sense) would have a little chuckle at this. Why then is the government so obsessed with keeping class sizes down? Because children learn best when the group size matches their needs, they are happy, well supervised and content. Children were never designed to learn in gangs!
Yes, the introduction of Diplomas will necessitate changes, because all children at KS4 are entitled to them. Our education department will need to ensure that all schools, not just the ones with super heads, academies and casino style schools which bring in big bucks, have a right to an education. The young people, families and residents of Billinghay deserve a look in.
“OFSTED and earlier research reveal small school community worth. Planning research has shown that costed against the tax-paying base major local authority services like education cost least in the smallest communities, most in the largest. The school is often the only return for village tax-payers on moneys otherwise spent largely in the towns. One LEA argued a few years ago that high unit costs were so fragmentary an element of the overall budget that savings from closing all its small schools would bring a one-off £50 payment to the rest ........jam spread thin indeed! Escalating dependence on transport is financially unwise, unpredictable and at odds with environmental policy.” Mervyn Benford of NASS
This potential school closure in Billinghay necessitates an escalating dependence on transport. We already spend a LOT of money on school transport (perhaps the people of Lincolnshire need to see figures for this published in the media), with young people living the life of commuters from the age of 12 (some start even earlier) all in the name of choice. Is there any evidence to prove that this is money well spent (apart from anecdotal evidence)? We have all just received our phenomenal Lincolnshire County Council Tax bills. What percentage of that is paying for school transport? Please enlighten us. How can we continue to justify big bills when alternative means have not been explored? This does not even touch upon the moral and ethical issues of our environmental footprint for the commuting child. Is there an argument for one teacher to commute to the children, or hundreds of children to commute to their teacher? No easy answers, but LCC has to provide some evidence for their decisions.
The ‘consultation letter’ talks about meetings with parents/carers and staff. No mention of the wider community. What about the future parents living in the village? What about those who may want to work locally, to have a part time job that they can walk to? Do they not have a voice? Have they been officially informed about all of this? Perhaps there are those who are sitting back in the belief that their child is far too intelligent to want a place at the school. Well, there are no guarantees, regarding intelligence or provision. All it would take would be for a different government to be voted in! So, while there is a process governed by law, there are also processes governed by conscience. Is that not what we as parents and educators strive to train up our children to achieve? The staff at the Lafford provide a good example of this.
As a parent myself, I was most shocked by the reactions at the open meeting held at the school. Broken promises, some parents feeling let down, tearful children pleading for their school, teachers (ever the professionals) silently observing. What messages were being communicated that night? Those ultimately responsible for the education of the children in our village (yes, our village) were passing on some very strong messages that night. Not about what they had done, more about what they hadn’t done.
As law-abiding citizens of this country, we still have free will and freedom of speech. As parents we have rights and responsibilities. Section 7 of the Education Act 1996 clearly spells out our parental responsibilities. “The parent of every child of compulsory school age shall cause him to receive efficient full-time education suitable to his age, ability and aptitude, and to any special educational needs he may have, either by regular attendance at school or otherwise.” As a result of the proposed closure, many parents are not making informed choices, but are being forced to choose because of fear of their child missing out on an education.
We can only make informed choices if those in authority make wise decisions. So, to those responsible for making these decisions, I appeal to your better natures to enable the parents of children in Billinghay and beyond, to exercise these rights and responsibilities. Listen, look around you, be filled with compassion, switch on your conscience, then act.
Friday, 14 March 2008
Reminder
'Caring Parents 101020' have posted a reminder (see below) that Peter Duxbury's letter requires responses if we are so engage in real dialogue. Please contact him directly or email me with comments which I can add to mine.
"This is an important letter, which needs our responses to make a difference. Our views by letter need to be received by Peter Duxbury (Director of Children’s Services) by the 9th April 2008."
"This is an important letter, which needs our responses to make a difference. Our views by letter need to be received by Peter Duxbury (Director of Children’s Services) by the 9th April 2008."
First they came...
First they came for the Communists,
and I didn’t speak up,
because I wasn’t a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn’t speak up,
because I wasn’t a Jew.
Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn’t speak up,
because I was a Protestant.
Then they came for me,
and by that time there was no one
left to speak up for me.
by Rev. Martin Niemoller, 1945
Thank you
Were you one of the people who went to see Douglas Hogg, MP? Please let us know how you got on.... well done to all you courageous people.
I would like to say a special thank you at this time to the staff of The Lafford High School in particular, as they have acted with tremendous dignity following the recent announcements. It has been very difficult for you as many risk losing your livelihoods. You have not really had a voice because of your professionalism. We care, we will stand up for you, we will speak out for you and all you represent. Remember, no one can steal your dignity and peace of mind - unless you allow them to. You have done so much for so many young people. That is never wasted. Have a happy weekend!
I would like to say a special thank you at this time to the staff of The Lafford High School in particular, as they have acted with tremendous dignity following the recent announcements. It has been very difficult for you as many risk losing your livelihoods. You have not really had a voice because of your professionalism. We care, we will stand up for you, we will speak out for you and all you represent. Remember, no one can steal your dignity and peace of mind - unless you allow them to. You have done so much for so many young people. That is never wasted. Have a happy weekend!
Thursday, 13 March 2008
Acting Headteacher and new minisite
The Executive Headteacher of the Lafford has resigned following the open meeting on 6th March. That means that there is an Acting Headteacher now in place, with responsibility for the on site running of the school. Parents have been informed today.
Executive Head resigns
Sadie Lawlor of the Sleaford Standard has kindly let me know that there is now a SAVE THE LAFFORD minisite on their website. You can access it from the homepage. It should have all the relevant articles and comments. All are welcome to add to the debate and move things forward. Please use it.
Sleaford Standard
Save the Lafford Minisite
Executive Head resigns
Sadie Lawlor of the Sleaford Standard has kindly let me know that there is now a SAVE THE LAFFORD minisite on their website. You can access it from the homepage. It should have all the relevant articles and comments. All are welcome to add to the debate and move things forward. Please use it.
Sleaford Standard
Save the Lafford Minisite
Wednesday, 12 March 2008
Letter to parents
This letter highlights several issues which have serious implications for the village as a whole, the wider community and for the communities of Tattershall, Ruskington and Sleaford. Paragraph five (Page 1) makes bizarre assumptions about minimum sizes of groups, which are totally unsubstantiated. I would like some evidence for this, please. Any other responses?
Billinghay Children's Centre
From the Sleaford Standard
"A facility to provide health and childcare needs for young children is progressing well. A new purpose-built children's centre, which will share the same site as Billinghay Primary School, is nearing completion. The centre will cater for the needs of families in the area with children aged up to five.
"A facility to provide health and childcare needs for young children is progressing well. A new purpose-built children's centre, which will share the same site as Billinghay Primary School, is nearing completion. The centre will cater for the needs of families in the area with children aged up to five.
Coun Patricia Bradwell, Lincolnshire County Council's executive councillor for children's services, said: "The centre will provide facilities and essential support all the year around for young children and their families. "Services could include baby-weigh in sessions with health visitors, support groups for families, and healthy eating and legal advice. There could also be lots of activities for youngsters, including reading, play, singing and crafts.
"The children's centre will work in partnership with local childcare and early years providers and there will be the opportunity to develop support for parents and carers, including training and help with employment." The centre will link with a range of schools and will be managed by Paul Watson, principal of St George's College of Technology, Sleaford."
----
How do the people of Billinghay feel about it?
Sleaford Target
Was I pleased to read today's Sleaford Target! Thanks especially for the publication of an excellent open letter to our MP, Douglas Hogg, from Don Irvine. He said it all.
The main article on the Lafford has not appeared in the online version as yet, though it should do soon.
Sleaford Target
When it does, just search for 'Lafford' and you should find all the relevant online articles.
Update: Here it is!
Happy day to you all ;-)
The main article on the Lafford has not appeared in the online version as yet, though it should do soon.
Sleaford Target
When it does, just search for 'Lafford' and you should find all the relevant online articles.
Update: Here it is!
Happy day to you all ;-)
Tuesday, 11 March 2008
Speak to your MP
I believe that Douglas Hogg, our MP, is in Sleaford this Friday. If you would like to take this case to him, please do so. Thankfully we still live in a democracy, have free speech and elected representatives. Use it!
Some suggestions:
Please let him know you are coming. Contact Douglas Hogg.
Take evidence with you - write things down so you don't forget what the most important points are. Take any relevant paperwork with you, petitions etc. The more evidence the better!
Stay calm and respectful at all times, leave the emotional stuff out.
Ask for his advice, ask him what he is prepared to do for your child, the village and his constituents.
If you are unable to use any of the links, feel free to use this email address for Douglas Hogg. Please do not abuse it. Just replace the 'at' with '@' , and the 'dot' with a '.'(done to prevent spam!)
hoggd at parliament dot uk
Have a happy day! There is much to be done. Oh additionally, there are still spaces for Parent Governors at the school. Are you interested? Contact the school and speak to someone in the office.
Some suggestions:
Please let him know you are coming. Contact Douglas Hogg.
Take evidence with you - write things down so you don't forget what the most important points are. Take any relevant paperwork with you, petitions etc. The more evidence the better!
Stay calm and respectful at all times, leave the emotional stuff out.
Ask for his advice, ask him what he is prepared to do for your child, the village and his constituents.
If you are unable to use any of the links, feel free to use this email address for Douglas Hogg. Please do not abuse it. Just replace the 'at' with '@' , and the 'dot' with a '.'(done to prevent spam!)
hoggd at parliament dot uk
Have a happy day! There is much to be done. Oh additionally, there are still spaces for Parent Governors at the school. Are you interested? Contact the school and speak to someone in the office.
Monday, 10 March 2008
Surprised
Honestly, I am surprised at how many of you have admitted to reading this blog! I thought it was just me :-) Many of you are safely watching from the sidelines, and that is quite okay. If anyone has made any 'next steps' plans, please, please, please let us know. Big changes happen when people act in unison. As I have gone on record saying this, I am happy to repeat it here, I am expecting a good outcome for all involved in this challenging situation.
Primarily, for every child involved and affected by this huge upheaval (and their families).
Secondly, for those employed at the school. All you hardworking committed folk who turn up day after day and try and keep it all together.
Thirdly, for the wider community of Billinghay and surrounding areas.
I am sure there are more. Do let me know.
So, feel free to write and comment here. You can choose to leave comments anonymously (I have no way of finding out who you are - unless you write and tell me so). As long as the responses are not discriminatory or illegal in any way, I will leave them here for others to read.
Primarily, for every child involved and affected by this huge upheaval (and their families).
Secondly, for those employed at the school. All you hardworking committed folk who turn up day after day and try and keep it all together.
Thirdly, for the wider community of Billinghay and surrounding areas.
I am sure there are more. Do let me know.
So, feel free to write and comment here. You can choose to leave comments anonymously (I have no way of finding out who you are - unless you write and tell me so). As long as the responses are not discriminatory or illegal in any way, I will leave them here for others to read.
Saturday, 8 March 2008
Ed Balls has this to say...
... fair choice 'needs good schools'.
Just today, Mr Balls (our Education Secretary) promised a national plan to improve 638 schools deemed to be struggling in England. He said, "Where one school is doing well and nearby schools are struggling, that is not real choice for parents", he told head teachers. Really?
Oh good. Perhaps they'll get round to doing something about the Lafford very very quickly! Contact Ed Balls and let him know what you think :-)
Just today, Mr Balls (our Education Secretary) promised a national plan to improve 638 schools deemed to be struggling in England. He said, "Where one school is doing well and nearby schools are struggling, that is not real choice for parents", he told head teachers. Really?
Oh good. Perhaps they'll get round to doing something about the Lafford very very quickly! Contact Ed Balls and let him know what you think :-)
Friday, 7 March 2008
Shropshire school
I encourage you to read this Shropshire Star article 'Have lessons been learned?' looking back at a battle to save school 22 years ago. Perhaps we can look back and learn something. The Corbet School was not always the success it is today. Yes, it has increased in size and has now become very popular indeed. What can Billinghay learn from their experiences?
David Smith, a grandfather from Myddle looks back on their battle:
“We had children at the school and faced the prospect of the school being closed due to the assumption by Shropshire County Council that the falling birth rate in the school’s catchment area would result in the school not being able to meet its intake requirement. The parents, governors and the PTA fought a campaign to keep the school open and won. The fact is the council got it wrong - their ‘assumption’ on falling intake numbers was wrong.”
Could we be saying the same thing in a few years? Never give up! Let us learn from the experiences of other people and keep moving forward.
David Smith, a grandfather from Myddle looks back on their battle:
“We had children at the school and faced the prospect of the school being closed due to the assumption by Shropshire County Council that the falling birth rate in the school’s catchment area would result in the school not being able to meet its intake requirement. The parents, governors and the PTA fought a campaign to keep the school open and won. The fact is the council got it wrong - their ‘assumption’ on falling intake numbers was wrong.”
Could we be saying the same thing in a few years? Never give up! Let us learn from the experiences of other people and keep moving forward.
Friday outside the school
A good number of folk gathered together at 11.00am for a peaceful protest against the planned closure of the school. It was a lively and friendly bunch of local folk. A large number of young people came out of school at break time to swell the numbers. A 'Citizenship' lesson, but this time in real life. We complain about young people not being bothered to vote. Well, the Lafford young people certainly voted, with their feet.
Parents were talking about what was happening in their homes with their children. Hardly any of them could concentrate on normal lessons. All they could think and worry about was the closure of their school. Their worries and questions had increased. These are young people who have been creating petitions, rallying round and generally motivating themselves (and their parents) to do something.
A Lincs FM reporter arrived to do some interviews. Not sure if they have already been on air, but I think he was quite surprised at what he was witnessing. Sadie from the Sleaford Standard came along for some photographs. The young people were certainly vocal. Eventually it was time to return to school, and with a bit of encouragement all were accounted for. Phew!
Everyone knows that there is much to do. It looks like Douglas Hogg, our MP, has agreed to see parents at in Sleaford next Friday. I don't have any more details on that, so if someone does will you please post it as a comment here and I will publicise it. This is the first step in gaining some ground on being heard. At the moment that is the least we can ask. A fair hearing is what local people want. We are all reasonable people, upset, yes, but all still reasonable. We must not forget that each parent who is stepping up to the plate wants the very best for their child. Now, that is a laudable thing.
It was a pleasure to see all the parents, young people and staff at the school gate (Note: the staff were NOT protesting, they were just collecting children and returning them to their classes!). Thanks everyone for a pleasant, peaceful protest and great publicity. I am getting to know so many new folk, I love it. I knew that the people who lived here were cool, I just didn't realise how many of you are out there! So whoever organised this Friday's meeting, well done.
Have a restful and stress-free weekend :-)
Latest Lincolnshire Echo article
Parents left frustrated by school closure meeting
While I think parents were frustrated, I sensed that the Director of Children's Services and Executive head were probably more than frustrated. There was a distinct inability to communicate properly with the people. Are they really the people who are running our education?
If you want to contact one of our four elected representatives, find their details here. Just type in your postcode and you will get a list of all our elected representatives.
Write to Them
Who are they?
Member of Parliament - Douglas Hogg (Con)
Lincolnshire County Councillor - Patricia Bradwell (Con)
NK District Councillor - Mike Powell (Ind)
NK District Councillor - Fred Ambridge (Con)
Please add your comments to the echo website and here too! And don't forget to write to your elected representatives, that's what they are there for. I especially urge all our young people to get writing. This is an excellent opportunity to say something that will make a difference. It's called democracy.
While I think parents were frustrated, I sensed that the Director of Children's Services and Executive head were probably more than frustrated. There was a distinct inability to communicate properly with the people. Are they really the people who are running our education?
If you want to contact one of our four elected representatives, find their details here. Just type in your postcode and you will get a list of all our elected representatives.
Write to Them
Who are they?
Member of Parliament - Douglas Hogg (Con)
Lincolnshire County Councillor - Patricia Bradwell (Con)
NK District Councillor - Mike Powell (Ind)
NK District Councillor - Fred Ambridge (Con)
Please add your comments to the echo website and here too! And don't forget to write to your elected representatives, that's what they are there for. I especially urge all our young people to get writing. This is an excellent opportunity to say something that will make a difference. It's called democracy.
Thursday, 6 March 2008
Thursday meeting
Well, well, well! What can I say after the meeting at the Lafford High School! Full house, loads of questions (most of which remained unanswered), very very cross parents, eloquent young people, emboldened young people. They were incredible. Billinghay should be proud of these young people, and we are. Perhaps a couple of you would like to join the Parish Council soon (you need to be 18).
There were so many questions, it was quite unbelievable. The truth was that the bodies in place did not satisfy the questions the people asked. There were just not listening to what people had to say. No county councillor spoke up or defended the management they had put in authority. It was embarrassing to watch a head and director crumble with no real or substantial answers. There were criticisms of management, of the difficult situations they had put their employees in. Still no result.
At the start we were reassured that no decision had been made. But, sadly, every sentence they said revealed their decision. No matter what the people said! It was as if there were totally hard of hearing.
Every Child Matters. Hmmmm.... Make your own mind up on that one. Young people spoke from their hearts, citing examples of bullying, poor options choices, excellent teachers who cared for them.... All the talk of 'Every Child Matters' really did not add up, all empty words. The arithmetic clearly did not add up.
The teachers were praised, the SENCo was singled out, another was voted in as an alternative head teacher. It was phenomenal. Eventually, people sloped off, discouraged and ready to give up.
Questions remains...
In the league tables of unsustainable schools across the fair county of Lincolnshire, where does the Lafford High School lie? Are we at the top, middle or at the bottom? In a county filled with schools, why did they pick Billinghay? We would still like to know!
There were so many questions, it was quite unbelievable. The truth was that the bodies in place did not satisfy the questions the people asked. There were just not listening to what people had to say. No county councillor spoke up or defended the management they had put in authority. It was embarrassing to watch a head and director crumble with no real or substantial answers. There were criticisms of management, of the difficult situations they had put their employees in. Still no result.
At the start we were reassured that no decision had been made. But, sadly, every sentence they said revealed their decision. No matter what the people said! It was as if there were totally hard of hearing.
Every Child Matters. Hmmmm.... Make your own mind up on that one. Young people spoke from their hearts, citing examples of bullying, poor options choices, excellent teachers who cared for them.... All the talk of 'Every Child Matters' really did not add up, all empty words. The arithmetic clearly did not add up.
The teachers were praised, the SENCo was singled out, another was voted in as an alternative head teacher. It was phenomenal. Eventually, people sloped off, discouraged and ready to give up.
Questions remains...
In the league tables of unsustainable schools across the fair county of Lincolnshire, where does the Lafford High School lie? Are we at the top, middle or at the bottom? In a county filled with schools, why did they pick Billinghay? We would still like to know!
What did I learn?
The clear message was:
WE WANT AND NEED THE LAFFORD SCHOOL IN BILLINGHAY.
Not sure if they heard that!
Wednesday, 5 March 2008
Not all it appears to be....
It appears that the County Council's version of events isn't strictly as reported. I have it on good authority that some Governors of the Lafford High School deny that they determined the closure of the school. So who did? Cllr Christine Talbot was interviewed by Rodders last Thursday and said it was the Governors of the Lafford. Is it true? Will we ever find out? Do you care?
So, what is to be done? Meet at the school on Thursday at 6.00pm, please. Come and see for yourself, ask questions, talk to the Governors and others, whoever is there. Don't take my word for it. This is a decision that will affect generations in the village.
National Association for Small Schools
The NASS (National Association for Small Schools) wrote this letter to support the parents and concerned community members in Billinghay.
What do you think about what they have to say? Is is as clear cut as the governors and authorities have made it out to be?
__
Though the Association largely deals with primary schools we find ourselves increasingly involved with secondary school cases such as Billinghay Lafford. We despair when governors accept the often flawed arguments about future prospects and educational viability (Explanation: This is based on all the reports that the Governors decided to close the school. No other reports have been received. This is the only evidence that exists so far.) Just now birth-rate is rising and back where it started to fall. DEFRA and the Commission for Rural Communities predict a significant migration from town to country which we see already happening in Cornwall, Cumbria and Somerset. Meanwhile surplus space can be very productively used or, as the Government has suggested, mothballed. The test of any school of any size is its performance. We believe Lincolnshire generally well-served by its rural secondaries, not least where selection still creams off higher ability pupils. Fairfield Community School in Herefordshire serves a very rural area and has an average roll a little over 300. It has twice won glowing praise from OFSTED and the last time, in 2007, was told it was “outstanding in everything it does.” That includes providing a broad and balanced curriculum. Currently it is the second best secondary school in the country in maths and English attainment and Value Added. US and Australian evidence argues that smaller schools are better for pupils, especially from disadvantaged backgrounds, and that as school becomes larger the gap between rich and poor widens. The Scottish Government in 2006 reported that pupils in its smallest primary schools (far from being havens of privilege) had a 25% higher chance of entering higher education while children in those schools from disadvantaged backgrounds actually make progress where their urban counterparts remain under-performing and disaffected, often expensively. Rural poverty is again a headline today. Small schools are the answer, especially when children are young. Parents in Morayshire rejected the LEA plan to close two small secondary schools and build a new super-school. The Council accepted their wishes. NASS knows parents can have confidence in small-scale education. A good small school knows its parents well and exploits their interest and loyalty creatively and effectively. The impact on students can be highly positive.
The potential for a professionally well-managed small school to succeed is high. Finance is often a factor behind closure, not least of small primary schools. However, the LEA should be worried at the significant escalation in transport costs in recent years. Scottish Councils agree £1500 per pupil per year per five-mile journey. One of our Shropshire members confirms this figure as they argue against closure. That figure is rising rapidly, predicted to increase 30% just in 2008. The cost of heating, lighting, cleaning and repair of a small village school building is now on average less than the cost of a bus to take them elsewhere and the cost of a newly-qualified teacher. Long journeys for 250 pupils for six years will be prohibitively expensive. We need more creative vision and financing from local authorities and more respect from the profession for the humanity of scale that small size offers. Why is the Gulbenkian Federation funding £3m of research into making secondary schools smaller in scale? Why are US authorities so rapidly trying to make their elementary and high schools smaller? Fairfield succeeds through very flexible approaches to the way teaching and learning are organised. Selected science lessons are in classes of 60-75 pupils and praised by OFSTED. Smaller schools are often very good at flexibility. The impact of closure on primary schools and pupils is important. Local jobs and other important economic factors remain central to rural sustainability. The test for Billinghay will be the assessment as parents, pupils and governors of the professional qualities currently represented and reflected in future planning. Only if on that assessment do all see no hope should closure be contemplated. Otherwise the school better serves its own distinctive communities and needs by remaining open and taking its own work forward perhaps extended where appropriate through local collaboration with other smaller rural schools.
Mervyn Benford
Information Officer
National Association for Small Schools
Let us know what you think, please, and join the meeting on Thursday 6th March at 6.00pm.
What do you think about what they have to say? Is is as clear cut as the governors and authorities have made it out to be?
__
Though the Association largely deals with primary schools we find ourselves increasingly involved with secondary school cases such as Billinghay Lafford. We despair when governors accept the often flawed arguments about future prospects and educational viability (Explanation: This is based on all the reports that the Governors decided to close the school. No other reports have been received. This is the only evidence that exists so far.) Just now birth-rate is rising and back where it started to fall. DEFRA and the Commission for Rural Communities predict a significant migration from town to country which we see already happening in Cornwall, Cumbria and Somerset. Meanwhile surplus space can be very productively used or, as the Government has suggested, mothballed. The test of any school of any size is its performance. We believe Lincolnshire generally well-served by its rural secondaries, not least where selection still creams off higher ability pupils. Fairfield Community School in Herefordshire serves a very rural area and has an average roll a little over 300. It has twice won glowing praise from OFSTED and the last time, in 2007, was told it was “outstanding in everything it does.” That includes providing a broad and balanced curriculum. Currently it is the second best secondary school in the country in maths and English attainment and Value Added. US and Australian evidence argues that smaller schools are better for pupils, especially from disadvantaged backgrounds, and that as school becomes larger the gap between rich and poor widens. The Scottish Government in 2006 reported that pupils in its smallest primary schools (far from being havens of privilege) had a 25% higher chance of entering higher education while children in those schools from disadvantaged backgrounds actually make progress where their urban counterparts remain under-performing and disaffected, often expensively. Rural poverty is again a headline today. Small schools are the answer, especially when children are young. Parents in Morayshire rejected the LEA plan to close two small secondary schools and build a new super-school. The Council accepted their wishes. NASS knows parents can have confidence in small-scale education. A good small school knows its parents well and exploits their interest and loyalty creatively and effectively. The impact on students can be highly positive.
The potential for a professionally well-managed small school to succeed is high. Finance is often a factor behind closure, not least of small primary schools. However, the LEA should be worried at the significant escalation in transport costs in recent years. Scottish Councils agree £1500 per pupil per year per five-mile journey. One of our Shropshire members confirms this figure as they argue against closure. That figure is rising rapidly, predicted to increase 30% just in 2008. The cost of heating, lighting, cleaning and repair of a small village school building is now on average less than the cost of a bus to take them elsewhere and the cost of a newly-qualified teacher. Long journeys for 250 pupils for six years will be prohibitively expensive. We need more creative vision and financing from local authorities and more respect from the profession for the humanity of scale that small size offers. Why is the Gulbenkian Federation funding £3m of research into making secondary schools smaller in scale? Why are US authorities so rapidly trying to make their elementary and high schools smaller? Fairfield succeeds through very flexible approaches to the way teaching and learning are organised. Selected science lessons are in classes of 60-75 pupils and praised by OFSTED. Smaller schools are often very good at flexibility. The impact of closure on primary schools and pupils is important. Local jobs and other important economic factors remain central to rural sustainability. The test for Billinghay will be the assessment as parents, pupils and governors of the professional qualities currently represented and reflected in future planning. Only if on that assessment do all see no hope should closure be contemplated. Otherwise the school better serves its own distinctive communities and needs by remaining open and taking its own work forward perhaps extended where appropriate through local collaboration with other smaller rural schools.
Mervyn Benford
Information Officer
National Association for Small Schools
Let us know what you think, please, and join the meeting on Thursday 6th March at 6.00pm.
Monday, 3 March 2008
Government reminder to rural authorities
Please read on BBC Online News:
Yet again, rural communities are at the mercy of our councils. When will it stop?
Comments from Caring Parents
I have decided to move these excellent comments to the front page to be read by all. Thank you 'Caring Parents'. Really appreciate your time to respond. Please email me (profile page) if I can support you in any way.
---
Tony Blair set out his priorities for office “ Education, education, education”. Gordon Brown pledged to eradicate failure from England’s schools by saying those which let children down will be taken over or closed. He said local authorities would be encouraged to use new powers to intervene in failing schools. Minimum standards in England’s schools would be raised with all schools needing to have 30% of their pupils achieving five high grade GCSEs by 2012-13. Schools which failed to meet that target could face being taken over by interim management boards, or by other successful schools including independent schools, or being turned into academies. "No more toleration of second best in Britain - no more toleration of second best for Britain.", "No longer acceptable for any school to fail its pupils”. Mr. Brookes, the general secretary of the NAHT said as quoted on the BBC news web site October 2007: "We call on parents, children and young people to unite in getting behind their school to maintain their right to a good education which is crucial to life chances. Children must insist on their right to a learning environment that promotes success, and have zero tolerance of peers who try to take away that right by constant disruption."
This week the Lafford High School Governors agreed to seek a phased closure. The Lafford High School is NOT a failing school. Our child joined this school and we have had no regrets. The teachers are exceptional; the standards of teaching are very high. The teachers and staff know each child individually giving a great advantage for excellent teaching and excellent child /parent/s relations. In March 2007 The Lafford High School became the most improved school in the whole country.
The school has formed a partnership with St.Georges college. Parents were told that the Lafford was entering into an academy status which would save the school and give greater opportunities for all children. The last school meeting told parents the school was entering into exciting times with fantastic opportunities ahead. The Lafford high school news letter of Dec 07 stated “last years year 11’s achieved the best GCSE results ever, in the history of the school 59% of students gained 5 or more GCSE A*-C grades”, and this “places us in the top 5% of schools nationally”
So it’s down to numbers! The letter to parents states 19 children have indicated that the Lafford is their school of first preference. The letter does not give statement or indications as to the amount of children that would have been attending the Lafford high school in September 2008. The Lafford high school is a small school in pupil numbers it seems. Was it not Ofsted that argued the quality of teaching in small schools is generally better than in large schools giving an important place in the community, in short ticking all the ECM boxes. (Every Child Matters) . The letter states numbers in the local primary schools are also declining, so there is little prospect of any significant upturn at the Lafford high school.
Does this mean that Billinghay primary school is next on the list of closures? Have parents there been informed? The letter states, to seek a phased closure of the Lafford High school by the local council as it could no longer offer a broad curriculum that meets the needs of all children and that this proposal was supported by a senior member of the local authority.
We understood that the broad curriculum was part of the increasing opportunities as being in partnership with St. Georges College or by entering into the governments school academies programme, are we no longer in partnership?
Friday, 29 February 2008
Closure news...
... of yet another Lincolnshire school. This time it's the Lafford High in Billinghay. It has been reported on the BBC Online News as well as the Lincolnshire Echo.
The Lafford
Does this affect you or someone you know? To say something here, please click on the 'responses' link below. You can do so anonymously if necessary. We do not collect any information about you.
The Lafford
Does this affect you or someone you know? To say something here, please click on the 'responses' link below. You can do so anonymously if necessary. We do not collect any information about you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
